Non-GAAP Measures (Alternative Performance Measures)

Accounting
Updated Oct 2026

Figures not defined in the accounting standards, such as adjusted operating profit or comparable EBITDA. In the EU they are called alternative performance measures (APMs).

What is Non-GAAP Measures?

Non-GAAP measures are financial figures that are not defined in the accounting standards a company reports under. Examples include adjusted operating profit, comparable EBITDA, adjusted earnings per share, free cash flow, net debt and organic growth. In the United States they are called non-GAAP measures; in the EU, where listed companies report under IFRS, the official term is alternative performance measures (APMs). Companies use them to show results without items they consider outside the ongoing business, such as restructuring costs, impairments or gains on selling a business. The rules require the company to define each measure, explain why it is used and reconcile it to the closest figure in the financial statements.

Example

Example

Nokia, Q3 2026, calculated from the company’s own report:

Step 1  Reported operating profit under IFRS: €196.0 million
Step 2  Items affecting comparability excluded by the company: +€409.0 million
Step 3  Adjusted EBIT, the company’s alternative performance measure: €605.0 million
Step 4  Adjusted figure vs. reported: +208.7%

Source: Nokia interim report Jan–Sep 2026

What adjusted profit is called in Nordic reports

There is no standard name. The same idea appears as adjusted EBIT (KONE), comparable operating profit or EBIT (Fortum, Nokia, UPM) and comparable EBITDA (Neste). What is removed is usually listed as “items affecting comparability” or “adjusting items”. Typical items are:

  • restructuring and redundancy costs
  • impairments of goodwill, other intangible assets or production plants
  • gains and losses on selling businesses, shares or real estate
  • acquisition and integration costs, and amortisation of intangible assets acquired in a business combination
  • for energy and commodity companies, changes in the fair value of derivatives and inventory valuation gains or losses

The adjustments go both ways. A gain on selling a business is removed from adjusted profit just as a restructuring cost is added back.

The rules: ESMA guidelines and IFRS 18

Since July 2016, the ESMA Guidelines on Alternative Performance Measures have applied to listed companies in the EU and EEA. A company that uses an APM in its reports or releases must:

  • define it and give it a name that reflects its content (not “operating profit” for a figure that is something else);
  • reconcile it to the closest line, subtotal or total in the financial statements;
  • explain why the measure is useful;
  • present it with no more prominence than the figures from the financial statements;
  • give comparatives for earlier periods and use it consistently over time, explaining any change in its definition.

IFRS 18, which applies to financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2027, moves part of this into the financial statements. Companies must disclose their management-defined performance measures, subtotals of income and expenses such as adjusted operating profit that they use in public communication, in a note. The note reconciles each measure to the closest IFRS subtotal and shows the tax and non-controlling interest effect of each adjustment, and it is audited as part of the financial statements. Measures that are not subtotals of income and expenses, such as free cash flow or net debt, stay outside the note.

How to read adjusted figures

  • Start with the reconciliation. Every report has a table from the reported to the adjusted figure. Read the individual items, not just the total.
  • Ask whether “one-off” keeps coming back. Restructuring costs every year are a cost of running the business. Add up the adjustments over three to five years and compare them with the adjusted profit over the same period.
  • Check both directions. If adjustments only ever add to profit and gains are never removed, be sceptical.
  • Use the same measure across years. A change in definition can make a trend look better than it is. Under the ESMA guidelines the company must explain any change.
  • Compare companies on reported figures as well. Two companies’ adjusted figures are rarely calculated the same way, while the IFRS figures follow common rules.

The table below compares each company’s reported and adjusted figure for the latest quarter. A small difference is normal. A large one means the quarter contained items the company considers exceptional, and the reconciliation table in its report explains what they were.

Reported vs. adjusted profit in Nordic companies we track

Latest reported quarter. The adjusted figure is the company’s own alternative performance measure (called adjusted, comparable or underlying, depending on the company); the difference is what the company excluded as items affecting comparability. Open a company for its charts and full history.

Reported vs. adjusted profit in Nordic companies we track
CompanyQuarterMeasureReportedAdjustedDifference
Elisa Q3 2026 Adjusted EBIT €126.1M €131.0M +€4.9M
Fortum Q2 2026 Adjusted EBIT €90.0M €106.0M +€16.0M
Harvia Q2 2026 Adjusted EBIT €8.4M €8.6M +€0.2M
Kesko Q2 2026 Adjusted EBIT €191.0M €194.0M +€3.0M
KONE Q2 2026 Adjusted EBIT €322.2M €369.9M +€47.7M
Konecranes Q3 2026 Adjusted EBIT €162.7M €163.5M +€0.8M
Marimekko Q2 2026 Adjusted EBIT €4.7M €5.1M +€0.4M
Neste Q2 2026 Adjusted EBITDA €1,144.0M €1,203.0M +€59.0M
Nokia Q3 2026 Adjusted EBIT €196.0M €605.0M +€409.0M
UPM Q2 2026 Adjusted EBIT €208.0M €212.0M +€4.0M
Wärtsilä Q2 2026 Adjusted EBIT €209.0M €218.0M +€9.0M

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between non-GAAP measures and alternative performance measures?

They are the same idea under different rules. “Non-GAAP” is the US term used in SEC Regulation G and Regulation S-K. “Alternative performance measure” is the term in the ESMA guidelines that apply to listed companies in the EU and EEA.

Are adjusted figures audited?

Until now, usually not. They appear in the management review of a report, which the auditor reads but does not audit. From 2027, IFRS 18 moves management-defined performance measures into an audited note to the financial statements.

Should I use the reported or the adjusted figure?

Both. The adjusted figure shows the trend the company wants to highlight; the reported figure includes every cost shareholders actually bore. Over several years the two should not drift far apart.

Is EBITDA an alternative performance measure?

Yes. EBITDA is not defined in IFRS, so a company that reports it must define and reconcile it like any other alternative performance measure.